Sundaralakshmi vs Ashokumar — 192/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O. 7, R. 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Rejected on 02nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ010066372023
Filing Number
1678/2023
Filing Date
05-07-2023
Registration No
192/2023
Registration Date
04-08-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
3-IIAdditional District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Rejected
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sundaralakshmi
Adv. G.Sudhakar, B.A., B.L.,
Respondent(s)
Ashokumar
Anusuya
Yasotha
Adv. Exparte
Prema
Adv. Exparte
Devaki
Adv. Exparte
Jayapraba
Umal Hasina
Hemaladha
Sumathi
Adv. Exparte
Balaji
Divya
Seenivasan
Adv. Mr.S.Suresh, B.Sc., B.L.,
Pandiyan
Adv. Mr.S.Suresh, B.Sc., B.L.,
Sureka
Adv. Mr.S.Suresh, B.Sc., B.L.,
Hemaladha
Adv. Mr.S.Suresh, B.Sc., B.L.,
Sub Registrar, Vallam
Adv. Government Pleader
The diesitrict Registrar, Thanjavur
Adv. Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 3-IIAdditional District Judge, Thanjavur
Disposed
Orders
Orders
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Orders |
| 23-03-2026 | Orders |
| 18-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 16-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's partition suit as barred by the statute of limitations. The defendants argued that the plaintiffs executed a registered release deed in 2016 relinquishing their rights to the property, and filed the suit in 2023—beyond the three-year limitation period. The court found the defendants' objection valid, holding that the limitation period expired in 2019 and the delayed suit filing was not adequately explained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's partition suit as barred by the statute of limitations. The defendants argued that the plaintiffs executed a registered release deed in 2016 relinquishing their rights to the property, and filed the suit in 2023—beyond the three-year limitation period. The court found the defendants' objection valid, holding that the limitation period expired in 2019 and the delayed suit filing was not adequately explained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts