SI of Police, Thiruvaiyaru P.S. vs KARTHIK — 234/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),351(3)BNSr/w25(1-A)ArmsAct. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTJ010059132025
e-Filing Number
05-02-2025
Filing Number
4408/2025
Filing Date
13-02-2025
Registration No
234/2025
Registration Date
02-07-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
542
Police Station
Thiruvaiyaru Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police, Thiruvaiyaru P.S.
Respondent(s)
KARTHIK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge of Thanjavur acquitted Karthik of all charges under BNS sections 296(b) (abusing in filthy language) and 351(3) (criminal intimidation with deadly weapon), and Arms Act section 25(1-A) (possession of prohibited weapon). The court found critical evidentiary gaps: no independent witnesses testified despite being present at the occurrence site, the seizure document lacked the accused's signature creating doubt about weapon recovery, and the prosecution failed to produce any government notification establishing the sword as a prohibited weapon. Consequently, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt and acquitted him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge of Thanjavur acquitted Karthik of all charges under BNS sections 296(b) (abusing in filthy language) and 351(3) (criminal intimidation with deadly weapon), and Arms Act section 25(1-A) (possession of prohibited weapon). The court found critical evidentiary gaps: no independent witnesses testified despite being present at the occurrence site, the seizure document lacked the accused's signature creating doubt about weapon recovery, and the prosecution failed to produce any government notification establishing the sword as a prohibited weapon. Consequently, the court granted the accused the benefit of doubt and acquitted him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts