Syad Mohamed vs State Government Rep By The Inspector of Police, Ayyampettai Police Station — 2803/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 250. Disposed: Uncontested--Partially Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ010045382025
Filing Number
3400/2025
Filing Date
23-05-2025
Registration No
2803/2025
Registration Date
26-05-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
2-Additional District Judge, Special Court under E C Act cases, Thanjavur
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Partially Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
Ayyampettai Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Syad Mohamed
Adv. D. Anandaprabu
Respondent(s)
State Government Rep By The Inspector of Police, Ayyampettai Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Judge, Special Court under E C Act cases, Thanjavur
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders |
| 09-03-2026 | Orders |
| 27-02-2026 | Orders |
| 23-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special Court under the Essential Commodities Act in Thanjavur discharged the accused Saiyadu Mohammed from charges under Sections 5, 7(1), and 24(1) of the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act 2003 and Sections 273 and 328 IPC. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of these offences—specifically, that the seized tobacco products bore proper warnings, that there was evidence of selling/distribution to minors or near educational institutions, or that the accused administered the products to anyone. Crucially, the court held that police cannot prosecute gutka/chewable tobacco offences independently; only the Food Safety Authority can initiate proceedings under the Food Safety Standards Act 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special Court under the Essential Commodities Act in Thanjavur discharged the accused Saiyadu Mohammed from charges under Sections 5, 7(1), and 24(1) of the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act 2003 and Sections 273 and 328 IPC. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of these offences—specifically, that the seized tobacco products bore proper warnings, that there was evidence of selling/distribution to minors or near educational institutions, or that the accused administered the products to anyone. Crucially, the court held that police cannot prosecute gutka/chewable tobacco offences independently; only the Food Safety Authority can initiate proceedings under the Food Safety Standards Act 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts