State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Thiruvaiyaru Police Station vs Thulasi Alais Thulasiraman Advocate - J.Manikandan — 193/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNTJ010042282025
Filing Number
3174/2025
Filing Date
28-04-2025
Registration No
193/2025
Registration Date
28-04-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
244
Police Station
Thiruvaiyaru Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Thiruvaiyaru Police Station
Respondent(s)
Thulasi Alais Thulasiraman Advocate - J.Manikandan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge of Thanjavur acquitted accused Thulasi of all charges under Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act, 1959, and Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of the IPC, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical deficiencies: the seizure mahazar lacked the accused's signature and was prepared before case registration, no independent witnesses were examined despite their presence at the scene, and the prosecution failed to produce government notification establishing the sword as a prohibited weapon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Principal Sessions Judge of Thanjavur acquitted accused Thulasi of all charges under Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act, 1959, and Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of the IPC, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical deficiencies: the seizure mahazar lacked the accused's signature and was prepared before case registration, no independent witnesses were examined despite their presence at the scene, and the prosecution failed to produce government notification establishing the sword as a prohibited weapon. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts