Viji vs Sambanthasamy Advocate - R. Udayakumar — 97/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O.7,R.1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTJ010032272024
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
809/2024
Filing Date
18-03-2024
Registration No
97/2024
Registration Date
16-04-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
3-IIAdditional District Judge, Thanjavur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Viji
Adv. M. Sivaraman
Saravanaselvan
Adv. M. Sivaraman
Shanmugapriya
Adv. M.Sivaraman
Respondent(s)
Sambanthasamy Advocate - R. Udayakumar
Elagovan
Adv. R. Udayakumar
Muthukumar
Adv. R. Udayakumar
Senthamilselvi
Adv. R. Udayakumar
Saroja
Adv. R. Udayakumar
The Sub Registrar
Adv. Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 3-IIAdditional District Judge, Thanjavur
Trial
Additional Written Statement
Amendment
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Trial |
| 16-03-2026 | Additional Written Statement |
| 11-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 09-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 05-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Thanjavur Case: I.A. No. 3/2025 in O.S. No. 97/2024 Date: 17 February 2026 Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction is dismissed. The petitioners sought to restrain respondents from transferring ancestral/undivided family property pending partition proceedings. Although respondents filed no counter or objections, the court dismissed the application, noting that the suit has already been filed and a related application (I.A. No. 2 of 2025) to implead a third party as 7th defendant has been allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Thanjavur Case: I.A. No. 3/2025 in O.S. No. 97/2024 Date: 17 February 2026 Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction is dismissed. The petitioners sought to restrain respondents from transferring ancestral/undivided family property pending partition proceedings. Although respondents filed no counter or objections, the court dismissed the application, noting that the suit has already been filed and a related application (I.A. No. 2 of 2025) to implead a third party as 7th defendant has been allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts