INSPECTOR OF POLICE S KEERTHIVASAN vs BARANITHARAN — 1803/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 52(A)OFNDPSACT. Disposed: Uncontested--Partially Allowed on 11th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010023902026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

1847/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

1803/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

2-Additional District Judge, Special Court under E C Act cases, Thanjavur

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Partially Allowed

Acts & Sections

NARCOTIC DRUGS & PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985 Section 52(A)OFNDPSACT

Petitioner(s)

INSPECTOR OF POLICE S KEERTHIVASAN

Respondent(s)

BARANITHARAN

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District Judge, Special Court under E C Act cases, Thanjavur

11-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Special Court in Thanjavur partially allowed the seizing officer's petition for disposal of seized ganja under NDPS Act Section 52(A). The court permitted the officer to photograph the seized contraband in court (already chemically confirmed as ganja) and then dispose of it, finding that retaking samples would be redundant since chemical analysis had already been completed. The court emphasized that while standard procedure requires magistrate-certified inventory and sample collection, the prior chemical testing satisfied the substantive requirements for safe disposal of the hazardous narcotic substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Court in Thanjavur partially allowed the seizing officer's petition for disposal of seized ganja under NDPS Act Section 52(A). The court permitted the officer to photograph the seized contraband in court (already chemically confirmed as ganja) and then dispose of it, finding that retaking samples would be redundant since chemical analysis had already been completed. The court emphasized that while standard procedure requires magistrate-certified inventory and sample collection, the prior chemical testing satisfied the substantive requirements for safe disposal of the hazardous narcotic substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case