INSPECTOR OF POLICE S KEERTHIVASAN vs BARANITHARAN — 1803/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 52(A)OFNDPSACT. Disposed: Uncontested--Partially Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ010023902026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
1847/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
1803/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
2-Additional District Judge, Special Court under E C Act cases, Thanjavur
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Partially Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE S KEERTHIVASAN
Respondent(s)
BARANITHARAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Judge, Special Court under E C Act cases, Thanjavur
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Court in Thanjavur partially allowed the seizing officer's petition for disposal of seized ganja under NDPS Act Section 52(A). The court permitted the officer to photograph the seized contraband in court (already chemically confirmed as ganja) and then dispose of it, finding that retaking samples would be redundant since chemical analysis had already been completed. The court emphasized that while standard procedure requires magistrate-certified inventory and sample collection, the prior chemical testing satisfied the substantive requirements for safe disposal of the hazardous narcotic substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Special Court in Thanjavur partially allowed the seizing officer's petition for disposal of seized ganja under NDPS Act Section 52(A). The court permitted the officer to photograph the seized contraband in court (already chemically confirmed as ganja) and then dispose of it, finding that retaking samples would be redundant since chemical analysis had already been completed. The court emphasized that while standard procedure requires magistrate-certified inventory and sample collection, the prior chemical testing satisfied the substantive requirements for safe disposal of the hazardous narcotic substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts