Ganesan vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, Sengipatti ps Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1782/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010023372026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

1805/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1782/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)
Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 21(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ganesan

    Adv. BALACHANDAR A.

  2. 2.Kumar Alias Kumarasamy

    Adv. BALACHANDAR A.

  3. 3.Kumar

    Adv. BALACHANDAR A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government rep by the inspector of police, Sengipatti ps (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Ganesan, Kumar, and Kumar) charged with theft of red soil in violation of the Mines and Minerals Act, considering their clean criminal records, willingness to comply with conditions, and the completion of material investigation. The bail was granted subject to strict conditions including a Rs. 5,000 non-refundable deposit, Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to police for 30 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1782/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur granted anticipatory bail to three accused (Ganesan, Kumar, and Kumar) charged with theft of red soil in violation of the Mines and Minerals Act, considering their clean criminal records, willingness to comply with conditions, and the completion of material investigation. The bail was granted subject to strict conditions including a Rs. 5,000 non-refundable deposit, Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting to police for 30 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case