Praveenkumar vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, Pandhanallur ps Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1793/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ010023242026
Filing Number
1801/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
1793/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
95
Police Station
Pandanallur Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Praveenkumar
Adv. B.Mohan
Ajithkumar
Premkumar
Manikandan
Divyanathan
Respondent(s)
State Government rep by the inspector of police, Pandhanallur ps (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge of Thanjavur allowed bail for five petitioners accused of illegally mining and stealing 25 units of red soil, considering their period of judicial custody, absence of serious prosecution objections, and willingness to comply with stringent conditions. Each petitioner must deposit Rs. 5,000 to a welfare center, execute a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, report daily to police for 30 days, and refrain from tampering with witnesses or leaving the jurisdiction without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge of Thanjavur allowed bail for five petitioners accused of illegally mining and stealing 25 units of red soil, considering their period of judicial custody, absence of serious prosecution objections, and willingness to comply with stringent conditions. Each petitioner must deposit Rs. 5,000 to a welfare center, execute a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, report daily to police for 30 days, and refrain from tampering with witnesses or leaving the jurisdiction without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts