Praveenkumar vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, Pandhanallur ps Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1793/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010023242026

Filing Number

1801/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1793/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

95

Police Station

Pandanallur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Praveenkumar

    Adv. B.Mohan

  2. 2.Ajithkumar

  3. 3.Premkumar

  4. 4.Manikandan

  5. 5.Divyanathan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government rep by the inspector of police, Pandhanallur ps (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge of Thanjavur allowed bail for five petitioners accused of illegally mining and stealing 25 units of red soil, considering their period of judicial custody, absence of serious prosecution objections, and willingness to comply with stringent conditions. Each petitioner must deposit Rs. 5,000 to a welfare center, execute a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, report daily to police for 30 days, and refrain from tampering with witnesses or leaving the jurisdiction without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1793/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge of Thanjavur allowed bail for five petitioners accused of illegally mining and stealing 25 units of red soil, considering their period of judicial custody, absence of serious prosecution objections, and willingness to comply with stringent conditions. Each petitioner must deposit Rs. 5,000 to a welfare center, execute a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, report daily to police for 30 days, and refrain from tampering with witnesses or leaving the jurisdiction without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case