Manikandan Alias Kullamani vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, Kabisthalam ps Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1761/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010022792026

Filing Number

1766/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

1761/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1163

Police Station

Kabisthalam Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manikandan Alias Kullamani

    Adv. J. Ajith

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government rep by the inspector of police, Kabisthalam ps (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur granted the petitioner Manikandan's request for extension of time to furnish sureties under the anticipatory bail order. The court extended the compliance deadline by 10 days from March 11, 2026, accepting the petitioner's explanation of illness for non-compliance with the original 30-day deadline, with a clear warning that no further extensions will be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1761/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur granted the petitioner Manikandan's request for extension of time to furnish sureties under the anticipatory bail order. The court extended the compliance deadline by 10 days from March 11, 2026, accepting the petitioner's explanation of illness for non-compliance with the original 30-day deadline, with a clear warning that no further extensions will be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case