Jemeel vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, Sethubavachathiram ps Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1744/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ010022422026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
1740/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
1744/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
69
Police Station
Sethubavachatram Police station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jemeel
Adv. Ajith jayaraj
Noorjahan
Adv. Ajith jayaraj
Mursith mohamed
Adv. Ajith jayaraj
Respondent(s)
State Government rep by the inspector of police, Sethubavachathiram ps (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Disposed
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Jemeel, Noorjahan, and Mursith Mohamed) charged with offences under sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of BNS in a family dispute case. The court considered that the injured person was discharged after two days, the petitioners had no prior criminal history, investigation was substantially complete, and there were no serious prosecution objections. Bail was granted subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Jemeel, Noorjahan, and Mursith Mohamed) charged with offences under sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) of BNS in a family dispute case. The court considered that the injured person was discharged after two days, the petitioners had no prior criminal history, investigation was substantially complete, and there were no serious prosecution objections. Bail was granted subject to conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts