kumar vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, Papanasam ps Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1746/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010022262026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

1724/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

1746/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

61

Police Station

Papanasam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

kumar

Adv. Raghavendran J

Thivakar

Adv. Raghavendran J

Respondent(s)

State Government rep by the inspector of police, Papanasam ps (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (Kumar and Thivakar) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) for a civil dispute-related altercation involving injury with a billhook. The court found that the injured person was discharged from hospital, both petitioners have no prior criminal records, investigation was substantially complete, and there were no serious prosecution objections. The bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur granted anticipatory bail to the two petitioners (Kumar and Thivakar) charged under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), and 351(3) for a civil dispute-related altercation involving injury with a billhook. The court found that the injured person was discharged from hospital, both petitioners have no prior criminal records, investigation was substantially complete, and there were no serious prosecution objections. The bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily reporting for 15 days, and surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case