Senthil Kumar vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, DCB PS, Thanjavur Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1629/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010020752026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

1615/2026

Filing Date

03-03-2026

Registration No

1629/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

D.C.B, Thanjavur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 406, 409, 420, 465, 467, 468, 470, 471, 120B

Petitioner(s)

Senthil Kumar

Adv. VEERAVIGNESH R

Kavitha

Adv. VEERAVIGNESH R

Sujatha

Adv. VEERAVIGNESH R

Respondent(s)

State Government rep by the inspector of police, DCB PS (Police Station), Thanjavur Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Orders

11-03-2026

Issue of Service

10-03-2026

Issue of Service

05-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners accused of forgery and cheating in a property dispute, finding that the 76-year-old complainant had suppressed material facts including 18 pending civil suits and an earlier complaint closed as civil in nature, thereby approaching the court with unclean hands and attempting to criminalize an essentially civil property dispute. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 30 days, and automatic cancellation if the petitioners fail to surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners accused of forgery and cheating in a property dispute, finding that the 76-year-old complainant had suppressed material facts including 18 pending civil suits and an earlier complaint closed as civil in nature, thereby approaching the court with unclean hands and attempting to criminalize an essentially civil property dispute. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 30 days, and automatic cancellation if the petitioners fail to surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case