Senthil Kumar vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, DCB PS, Thanjavur Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1629/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ010020752026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
1615/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
1629/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 19-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
D.C.B, Thanjavur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Senthil Kumar
Adv. VEERAVIGNESH R
-
2.Kavitha
Adv. VEERAVIGNESH R
-
3.Sujatha
Adv. VEERAVIGNESH R
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government rep by the inspector of police, DCB PS (Police Station), Thanjavur Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners accused of forgery and cheating in a property dispute, finding that the 76-year-old complainant had suppressed material facts including 18 pending civil suits and an earlier complaint closed as civil in nature, thereby approaching the court with unclean hands and attempting to criminalize an essentially civil property dispute. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 30 days, and automatic cancellation if the petitioners fail to surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
11-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
10-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge, Thanjavur
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1629/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners accused of forgery and cheating in a property dispute, finding that the 76-year-old complainant had suppressed material facts including 18 pending civil suits and an earlier complaint closed as civil in nature, thereby approaching the court with unclean hands and attempting to criminalize an essentially civil property dispute. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily reporting for 30 days, and automatic cancellation if the petitioners fail to surrender within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts