Dinesh vs State Government rep by the inspector of police, Orathanadu ps Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 1781/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010020392026

Filing Number

1592/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

1781/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

91

Police Station

Orathanadu Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh

    Adv. Prabakaran. S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government rep by the inspector of police, Orathanadu ps (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, dismissed the bail petition of Dinesh (accused in a robbery case under BNS sections 304/310(4)) on March 11, 2026. The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's custody since February 25, 2026, citing the serious nature of the offense (Rs. 15 lakh robbery with only Rs. 10.5 lakh recovered), three absconding co-accused, pending investigation, and strong prosecution objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Thanjavur

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1781/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, dismissed the bail petition of Dinesh (accused in a robbery case under BNS sections 304/310(4)) on March 11, 2026. The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's custody since February 25, 2026, citing the serious nature of the offense (Rs. 15 lakh robbery with only Rs. 10.5 lakh recovered), three absconding co-accused, pending investigation, and strong prosecution objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case