Muruganantham vs State Government — 795/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 6(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 28th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNTJ010012452026
Filing Number
977/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
795/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Thanjavur
Judge
12-Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muruganantham
Adv. Vaithilingam. K
Respondent(s)
State Government
Hearing History
Judge: 12-Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Orders |
| 18-03-2026 | Orders |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the accused's petition for passport renewal, holding that mere pendency of a criminal case (involving charges under IPC sections 302 and 201) is not grounds for refusing renewal. The court imposed a condition that if the petitioner wishes to travel abroad for research or employment, he must obtain prior permission from the trial court before leaving the country. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the accused's petition for passport renewal, holding that mere pendency of a criminal case (involving charges under IPC sections 302 and 201) is not grounds for refusing renewal. The court imposed a condition that if the petitioner wishes to travel abroad for research or employment, he must obtain prior permission from the trial court before leaving the country. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts