Muruganantham vs State Government — 795/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 6(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNTJ010012452026

Filing Number

977/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

795/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Thanjavur

Judge

12-Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 6(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muruganantham

    Adv. Vaithilingam. K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court allowed the accused's petition for passport renewal, holding that mere pendency of a criminal case (involving charges under IPC sections 302 and 201) is not grounds for refusing renewal. The court imposed a condition that if the petitioner wishes to travel abroad for research or employment, he must obtain prior permission from the trial court before leaving the country. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram, Thanjavur

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 795/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the accused's petition for passport renewal, holding that mere pendency of a criminal case (involving charges under IPC sections 302 and 201) is not grounds for refusing renewal. The court imposed a condition that if the petitioner wishes to travel abroad for research or employment, he must obtain prior permission from the trial court before leaving the country. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case