K.Bharathi vs P.T.Muthusamy Advocate - Yokeswari A — 735/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI250014912022
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
673/2022
Filing Date
08-11-2022
Registration No
735/2022
Registration Date
08-11-2022
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet
Judge
5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Bharathi
Adv. Ramakrishnan K
Respondent(s)
P.T.Muthusamy Advocate - Yokeswari A
S.Prabhavathy
Adv. Yokeswari A
Hearing History
Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet
For further Proceedings
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 24-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 25-02-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
Summary: In case A.V.No. 735/2022 dated 06.08.2025 before the 4th Additional District Court, Udumalaipettai, the witness (Bharati, age 56) was examined and his testimony was recorded and typed. The witness affirmed that the signature and details in the affidavit filed are his own, and he confirmed the documents produced as exhibits (including a certificate dated 13.07.2009, lawyer's letter dated 07.10.2022, and acknowledgment receipts from defendants). The court recorded the witness testimony in the prescribed manner, which was read over to and acknowledged by the witness before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In case A.V.No. 735/2022 dated 06.08.2025 before the 4th Additional District Court, Udumalaipettai, the witness (Bharati, age 56) was examined and his testimony was recorded and typed. The witness affirmed that the signature and details in the affidavit filed are his own, and he confirmed the documents produced as exhibits (including a certificate dated 13.07.2009, lawyer's letter dated 07.10.2022, and acknowledgment receipts from defendants). The court recorded the witness testimony in the prescribed manner, which was read over to and acknowledged by the witness before the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts