Mrs.Savithiri vs Thirumathal Advocate - Naimar mohamad T — 161/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI250013882022

Amendment

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Number

623/2022

Filing Date

12-06-2015

Registration No

161/2015

Registration Date

12-06-2015

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet

Judge

5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1
Court Fees Act, 1870 Section U/s37
Ia/5/2025 Classification : Impleading Petition Section Mrs.SavithiriThirumathal
Ia/6/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section Mrs.SavithiriThirumathal
Ia/7/2025 Classification : Petition to Appoint Guardian Section Mrs.SavithiriThirumathal
Ia/8/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section Mrs.SavithiriThirumathal
Ia/9/2026 Classification : Condonation of Delay Petition Section Mrs.SavithiriThirumathal

Petitioner(s)

Mrs.Savithiri

Adv. Chinnasamy A C

Respondent(s)

Thirumathal Advocate - Naimar mohamad T

Vadivelu

Adv. Jayabalan C

Balasenthilkumar

Adv. Naimar mohamad T

Vallinayagam

Adv. Sundararaju V

Mohansundari

Adv. Naimar mohamad T

Sarathambal

Mahalakshmi

Adv. Naimar mohamad T

Hearing History

Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

09-03-2026

Amendment

05-03-2026

IA Pending

26-02-2026

IA Pending

13-02-2026

IA Pending

29-01-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

12-12-2024
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The petition filed by Mrs. Savithiri under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC to file a reply statement has been allowed without costs. The court permitted the plaintiff to file her reply statement to deny the false allegations made in the 2nd defendant's additional written statement regarding a prior suit (OS No. 7/2005), finding it necessary for her to plead her contentions and lead evidence on those aspects during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Mrs. Savithiri under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC to file a reply statement has been allowed without costs. The court permitted the plaintiff to file her reply statement to deny the false allegations made in the 2nd defendant's additional written statement regarding a prior suit (OS No. 7/2005), finding it necessary for her to plead her contentions and lead evidence on those aspects during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case