Manjuladevi and 3 others vs Subramanian and others — 70/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTI250012112022
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
541/2022
Filing Date
05-08-2022
Registration No
70/2022
Registration Date
05-08-2022
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet
Judge
5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manjuladevi and 3 others
Adv. Thambi Prabakaran J
Minor.Dhanusri
Adv. Thambi Prabakaran J
Minor.Kanishma
Adv. Thambi Prabakaran J
Cheniyammal
Adv. Thambi Prabakaran J
Respondent(s)
Subramanian and others
United India Insurance Com.ltd
Adv. Ganesh Kumar S
Hearing History
Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The court (MCOP No. 70/2022, dated 21.11.2025) examined an case involving an assistant surveyor from Tali police station. After analyzing witness testimonies and evidence including a diary and vehicle parts found at the incident site, the court found insufficient direct eyewitness evidence to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court dismissed the charge against the accused, as there was no reliable direct witness testimony connecting him to the alleged incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court (MCOP No. 70/2022, dated 21.11.2025) examined an case involving an assistant surveyor from Tali police station. After analyzing witness testimonies and evidence including a diary and vehicle parts found at the incident site, the court found insufficient direct eyewitness evidence to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court dismissed the charge against the accused, as there was no reliable direct witness testimony connecting him to the alleged incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts