Periyasamy and another vs C. Marimuthu and another Advocate - Senthilkumar T — 52/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTI250010992022

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

Filing Number

491/2022

Filing Date

29-07-2022

Registration No

52/2022

Registration Date

29-07-2022

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet

Judge

5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Periyasamy and another

Adv. Ganesh Kumar S

Kannamal

Adv. Ganesh Kumar S

Respondent(s)

C. Marimuthu and another Advocate - Senthilkumar T

Reliance General Insurance Company limited rep by its Branch Manager

Adv. Mathisekar

T. Sankar

Hearing History

Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

05-03-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

23-01-2026

Evidence

19-01-2026

Evidence

17-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

23-01-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a Motor Accident Claim Petition (MCOP No.52/2022) dated 23.01.2026 from the 4th Additional District Court in Udumalai Pettai, Tamil Nadu. The court recorded the testimony of Arun, an employee of Reliance General Insurance, regarding an insurance claim related to vehicle TN 66 E 1294. The witness's statement was recorded, transcribed, and authenticated through cross-examination, with the witness affirming the accuracy of the recorded testimony before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a Motor Accident Claim Petition (MCOP No.52/2022) dated 23.01.2026 from the 4th Additional District Court in Udumalai Pettai, Tamil Nadu. The court recorded the testimony of Arun, an employee of Reliance General Insurance, regarding an insurance claim related to vehicle TN 66 E 1294. The witness's statement was recorded, transcribed, and authenticated through cross-examination, with the witness affirming the accuracy of the recorded testimony before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case