Selvanayaki and 4 others vs M.Murugan and others Advocate - Basheer Ahamed A — 43/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTI250010812022

Amendment

Next Hearing

26th March 2026

Filing Number

482/2022

Filing Date

29-07-2022

Registration No

43/2022

Registration Date

29-07-2022

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet

Judge

5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section Selvanayaki and 4 othersM.Murugan and others

Petitioner(s)

Selvanayaki and 4 others

Adv. Ramakrishnan K

Minor Dharshini

Adv. Ramakrishnan K

Minor Dhanushree

Adv. Ramakrishnan K

Nachimuthugounder

Adv. Ramakrishnan K

Udayammal

Adv. Ramakrishnan K

Respondent(s)

M.Murugan and others Advocate - Basheer Ahamed A

Lakshmi

Adv. Uthayakumar M

Hearing History

Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

05-03-2026

Amendment

06-02-2026

Amendment

07-01-2026

IA Pending

04-12-2025

IA Pending

18-11-2025

IA Pending

Interim Orders

26-11-2024
Copy of Deposition

Summary In MCOP No. 43/22 dated 26.11.2024 from the 4th Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet, the witness testified under oath regarding their statements submitted as evidence. The court examined the witness in open court, recorded the testimony, cross-examined the witness, and the witness acknowledged the accuracy of the recorded statement. The petition is allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In MCOP No. 43/22 dated 26.11.2024 from the 4th Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet, the witness testified under oath regarding their statements submitted as evidence. The court examined the witness in open court, recorded the testimony, cross-examined the witness, and the witness acknowledged the accuracy of the recorded statement. The petition is allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case