Senthilraj vs V.Chandrasekaran Advocate - Subramanian K — 261/2020

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 42. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI250006752022

Await Reports

Next Hearing

22nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

286/2020

Filing Date

28-07-2020

Registration No

261/2020

Registration Date

06-08-2020

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet

Judge

5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 42
IA/9/2025 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section SenthilrajV.Chandrasekaran

Petitioner(s)

Senthilraj

Adv. Hariprasaadh A R

Respondent(s)

V.Chandrasekaran Advocate - Subramanian K

Karthikeyan

Adv. G.A.Athipathi

C.Sivakumar

Adv. Subramanian K

Hearing History

Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

06-04-2026

Await Reports

23-03-2026

IA Pending

09-03-2026

IA Pending

04-03-2026

IA Pending

13-02-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

28-11-2025
Copy of Judgment

SUMMARY: The court allowed the petitioner's application and appointed an expert/commissioner to compare the signatures on two disputed documents—a 2012 agreement and a 2015 deed extension—to determine their authenticity. The petitioner claims the defendant forged his signatures on the 2015 extension document, while the defendant contends both documents were properly executed with the petitioner's consent. The court ordered that both documents be sent to a forensic science laboratory for handwriting expert analysis and comparison. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court allowed the petitioner's application and appointed an expert/commissioner to compare the signatures on two disputed documents—a 2012 agreement and a 2015 deed extension—to determine their authenticity. The petitioner claims the defendant forged his signatures on the 2015 extension document, while the defendant contends both documents were properly executed with the petitioner's consent. The court ordered that both documents be sent to a forensic science laboratory for handwriting expert analysis and comparison. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case