Saradhamani vs Balasubramaniam Advocate - Sasikumar K — 439/2020

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI250006712022

Orders

Next Hearing

18th March 2026

Filing Number

284/2020

Filing Date

02-11-2020

Registration No

439/2020

Registration Date

18-11-2020

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet

Judge

5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2)
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section BalasubramaniamSaradhamani

Petitioner(s)

Saradhamani

Adv. Sivakumar S

Respondent(s)

Balasubramaniam Advocate - Sasikumar K

Ramakrishnan

Adv. Sasikumar K

HDFC Bank Rep By Branch manager

Hearing History

Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

05-03-2026

Orders

25-02-2026

Orders

17-02-2026

Orders

29-01-2026

Orders

06-01-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

07-11-2022
Copy of Deposition

This is a civil court order dated 07.11.2022 from Tamil Nadu in case A.V. No. 439/2020, documenting the examination-in-chief testimony of a witness (DW.1) in a property dispute case. The witness testified regarding ancestral property (Thava land), a partition deed (Ex.A.1) dated 06.02.2014, inheritance matters, and competing claims to property shares among family members. The order records the witness's detailed statement about property ownership, agricultural land transactions, bank loans, and property valuations in a family inheritance dispute, but does not contain a final judgment or case outcome—it is merely a record of witness testimony and examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil court order dated 07.11.2022 from Tamil Nadu in case A.V. No. 439/2020, documenting the examination-in-chief testimony of a witness (DW.1) in a property dispute case. The witness testified regarding ancestral property (Thava land), a partition deed (Ex.A.1) dated 06.02.2014, inheritance matters, and competing claims to property shares among family members. The order records the witness's detailed statement about property ownership, agricultural land transactions, bank loans, and property valuations in a family inheritance dispute, but does not contain a final judgment or case outcome—it is merely a record of witness testimony and examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case