Senthil arasu vs Dhanalakshmi Sports rep. by its partner V.K.Subramanian Advocate - Senniappan G — 675/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 22. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI250004942023

Part Heard

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1740/2023

Filing Date

31-08-2023

Registration No

675/2023

Registration Date

31-08-2023

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet

Judge

5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 22
IA/2/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section Senthil arasuDhanalakshmi Sports rep. by its partner V.K.Subramanian
IA/3/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section Senthil arasuDhanalakshmi Sports rep. by its partner V.K.Subramanian

Petitioner(s)

Senthil arasu

Adv. Mohamed Shajahan

Respondent(s)

Dhanalakshmi Sports rep. by its partner V.K.Subramanian Advocate - Senniappan G

Dhanalakshmi Spotrs Rep by Partner Sivabalan

Adv. Senniappan G

V.K.Subramaniyan

Adv. Senniappan G

Sivabalan

Adv. Senniappan G

Hearing History

Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

08-04-2026

Part Heard

24-03-2026

Part Heard

09-03-2026

Part Heard

23-02-2026

Part Heard

05-02-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary The court proceeding on 09.03.2026 in case no. A.V.675/2023 before the 4th Additional District Court, Udumalaipettai involved witness examination. The witness (Besalvaraj, a farmer) provided sworn testimony regarding a promissory note and related documents, confirming signatures. The cross-examination of the defendant's counsel was adjourned to be completed at a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court proceeding on 09.03.2026 in case no. A.V.675/2023 before the 4th Additional District Court, Udumalaipettai involved witness examination. The witness (Besalvaraj, a farmer) provided sworn testimony regarding a promissory note and related documents, confirming signatures. The cross-examination of the defendant's counsel was adjourned to be completed at a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case