M.Ramaraj vs K.M Kandasamy Mavadithurai Advocate - Mohanraj R — 411/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI250002732022
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
86/2020
Filing Date
14-10-2020
Registration No
411/2020
Registration Date
04-11-2020
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet
Judge
5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Ramaraj
Adv. Hariprasaadh A R
Respondent(s)
K.M Kandasamy Mavadithurai Advocate - Mohanraj R
Hearing History
Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet
Evidence
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 02-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 16-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: A.V. 411/2020 Court: 4th Additional District Court, Udumalaipettai Date: 07.04.2026 Outcome: The witness was examined and cross-examined by the defendant. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was typed, shown to the witness, read over, and signed by the witness before the judge. The case involves a dispute over lease agreements for property, with conflicting claims regarding deadlines, advance payments, and the defendant's failure to deliver the property. The judgment addresses the admissibility and credibility of the witness testimony regarding two separate lease agreements executed on different dates with varying terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: A.V. 411/2020 Court: 4th Additional District Court, Udumalaipettai Date: 07.04.2026 Outcome: The witness was examined and cross-examined by the defendant. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was typed, shown to the witness, read over, and signed by the witness before the judge. The case involves a dispute over lease agreements for property, with conflicting claims regarding deadlines, advance payments, and the defendant's failure to deliver the property. The judgment addresses the admissibility and credibility of the witness testimony regarding two separate lease agreements executed on different dates with varying terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts