Bakiyalakshmi vs K. Sivaraj Advocate - K.Subramanian — 159/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2),27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI250001012024
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
187/2024
Filing Date
05-01-2024
Registration No
159/2024
Registration Date
06-03-2024
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet
Judge
5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bakiyalakshmi
Adv. T. Elangovan
Tamilarasi
Adv. T. Elangovan
Vasanthamani
Adv. T. Elangovan
Chitra
Adv. T. Elangovan
Respondent(s)
K. Sivaraj Advocate - K.Subramanian
S. K. Arunachalam
Adv. S.N.Duraikannan
The State Rep By District Collector, Tiruppur
Adv. Additional Government Pleader
The Revenue Divitional Officer, Udumalpet
Adv. Additional Government Pleader
The Tahsildar, Udumalpet
Adv. Additional Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet
Part Heard
Evidence
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 05-02-2026 | Trial | |
| 02-01-2026 | Trial | |
| 03-12-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary: Case No. A.V. 159/2024 dated 09.03.2026 from the 4th Additional District Court, Udumalaipettai. Witness Chitra (age 52, agriculturist from Tiruppur district) testified as the 4th witness and submitted her affidavit evidence along with 17 documentary exhibits including death certificates, heir certificates, revenue records, and historical deeds. The court adjourned the case to allow counsel to file and mark additional documents as per request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case No. A.V. 159/2024 dated 09.03.2026 from the 4th Additional District Court, Udumalaipettai. Witness Chitra (age 52, agriculturist from Tiruppur district) testified as the 4th witness and submitted her affidavit evidence along with 17 documentary exhibits including death certificates, heir certificates, revenue records, and historical deeds. The court adjourned the case to allow counsel to file and mark additional documents as per request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts