M.Nadarajan Prop. G.D.Finance vs S.Shanmugavel Advocate - jude prabu j — 33/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 42,22,27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI250000612023
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
31/2023
Filing Date
06-01-2023
Registration No
33/2023
Registration Date
06-01-2023
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet
Judge
5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Nadarajan Prop. G.D.Finance
Adv. Thilagavarma S
Respondent(s)
S.Shanmugavel Advocate - jude prabu j
Hearing History
Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 25-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 25-02-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 19-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
The document is in Tamil and appears to be a court order from the 4th Additional District Court, Udumalaipettai (Case No. 33/2023, dated 10.10.2025). The order records the witness examination testimony of the plaintiff (Nataraj) regarding a financial dispute involving a loan of Rs. 30 lakhs given to the defendant, secured by a mortgage and hire-purchase agreement on 4.79 acres of property. The witness testified that the defendant repaid the loan in 2019 but he failed to execute the deed of release for the mortgage and hire-purchase agreement as promised. The court has recorded the witness statement, which was typed, read over, and signed by the witness in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The document is in Tamil and appears to be a court order from the 4th Additional District Court, Udumalaipettai (Case No. 33/2023, dated 10.10.2025). The order records the witness examination testimony of the plaintiff (Nataraj) regarding a financial dispute involving a loan of Rs. 30 lakhs given to the defendant, secured by a mortgage and hire-purchase agreement on 4.79 acres of property. The witness testified that the defendant repaid the loan in 2019 but he failed to execute the deed of release for the mortgage and hire-purchase agreement as promised. The court has recorded the witness statement, which was typed, read over, and signed by the witness in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts