Nagamanickam vs Rathinasamy — 1/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138&142. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNTI250000322026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

17-12-2025

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

12-01-2026

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet

Judge

5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138&142
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(1),430(1)
MP/1/2025 Classification : Condonation of Delay Petition Section Nagamanickam

Petitioner(s)

Nagamanickam

Adv. RANGITHKUMAR PITCHAI

Respondent(s)

Rathinasamy

Hearing History

Judge: 5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

09-03-2026

Disposed

17-02-2026

Await Records

19-01-2026

Await Records

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary: The IVth Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet allowed the criminal appeal filed by Nagamanickam under Section 415(3) BNSS against a cheque bounce conviction. The court acquitted the appellant after both parties filed a settlement petition under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, with the appellant having paid the cheque amounts to the complainant, who consequently withdrew the complaint. The respondent was also permitted to withdraw the deposit amount from the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The IVth Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet allowed the criminal appeal filed by Nagamanickam under Section 415(3) BNSS against a cheque bounce conviction. The court acquitted the appellant after both parties filed a settlement petition under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, with the appellant having paid the cheque amounts to the complainant, who consequently withdrew the complaint. The respondent was also permitted to withdraw the deposit amount from the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case