Nagamanickam vs Rathinasamy — 1/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138&142. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLA - Criminal Appeal

CNR: TNTI250000322026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet

Judge

5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138&142
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(1),430(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nagamanickam

    Adv. RANGITHKUMAR PITCHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rathinasamy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: The IVth Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet allowed the criminal appeal filed by Nagamanickam under Section 415(3) BNSS against a cheque bounce conviction. The court acquitted the appellant after both parties filed a settlement petition under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, with the appellant having paid the cheque amounts to the complainant, who consequently withdrew the complaint. The respondent was also permitted to withdraw the deposit amount from the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Await Records

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The IVth Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet allowed the criminal appeal filed by Nagamanickam under Section 415(3) BNSS against a cheque bounce conviction. The court acquitted the appellant after both parties filed a settlement petition under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, with the appellant having paid the cheque amounts to the complainant, who consequently withdrew the complaint. The respondent was also permitted to withdraw the deposit amount from the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case