S. Ramanathan vs The Branch Manager, State Banck of India, Amaravathinagar Advocate - M. Sethuraman — 42/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI250000282024

Filing Number

10/2024

Filing Date

02-Jan-2024

Registration No

42/2024

Registration Date

12-Jan-2024

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Udumalpet

Judge

5-IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S. Ramanathan

    Adv. Jayabalan C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Branch Manager, State Banck of India, Amaravathinagar Advocate - M. Sethuraman

  2. 2.The Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Tiruppur

    Adv. M. Sethuraman

  3. 3.The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Chennai

    Adv. M. Sethuraman

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  10. 11-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This is a court order from the 4th Additional District Consumer Court in Udumalaipet dated November 11, 2025 (Case No. 42/2024). The court examined the plaintiff's testimony regarding a banking dispute involving account closure, NPA classification, and alleged wrongful conduct by the defendant bank. The plaintiff claims compensation of ₹88,15,000 for damages, asserting the bank's actions caused financial and reputational harm, while the bank contends the account was properly classified as NPA due to loan payment defaults. The court recorded the witness examination and deferred the judgment to a subsequent hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 11-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  12. 24-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 24-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  14. 09-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  15. 18-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  16. 10-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 10-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  18. 21-Aug-2025

    Trial

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  19. 21-Jul-2025

    Trial

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  20. 13-Jun-2025

    Trial

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  21. 09-Apr-2025

    Trial

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  22. 20-Feb-2025

    Trial

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  23. 09-Jan-2025

    Trial

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  24. 02-Dec-2024

    Issues

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  25. 24-Oct-2024

    Issues

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  26. 27-Sep-2024

    Issues

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  27. 20-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  28. 28-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  29. 25-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  30. 20-Jun-2024

    For further Proceedings

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  31. 26-Apr-2024

    For further Proceedings

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  32. 04-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  33. 09-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    IV Additional District Judge,Udumalapet

  34. 19-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 02-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a court order from the 4th Additional District Consumer Court in Udumalaipet dated November 11, 2025 (Case No. 42/2024). The court examined the plaintiff's testimony regarding a banking dispute involving account closure, NPA classification, and alleged wrongful conduct by the defendant bank. The plaintiff claims compensation of ₹88,15,000 for damages, asserting the bank's actions caused financial and reputational harm, while the bank contends the account was properly classified as NPA due to loan payment defaults. The court recorded the witness examination and deferred the judgment to a subsequent hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case