Mythili vs Sumathi Advocate - Exparte — 23/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1Cpc. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI230028202024

Part Heard

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

33/2024

Filing Date

29-10-2024

Registration No

23/2024

Registration Date

29-10-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7R1Cpc
IA/1/2024 Classification : Petition to appoint commissioner Section MythiliSumathi

Petitioner(s)

Mythili

Adv. S Dhanapal

Respondent(s)

Sumathi Advocate - Exparte

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

15-04-2026

Part Heard

06-04-2026

Part Heard

30-03-2026

Part Heard

24-03-2026

Judgement

16-03-2026

Judgement

Interim Orders

05-06-2025
Copy of Deposition

Summary In Original Case No. 23/2024 before the District Civil and Criminal Court, Uthukkuli, the first witness (PW-1) Maitili, daughter of the deceased Ganesan, gave sworn testimony on June 5, 2025 regarding a civil property matter. The witness's affidavit and seven supporting documents—including a previous court judgment (Case No. 341/2012), death certificate, heirship certificate, and property deeds—were recorded and marked as exhibits. The defendant did not contest the case, and cross-examination was dispensed with; the case proceeded based on the plaintiff's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Original Case No. 23/2024 before the District Civil and Criminal Court, Uthukkuli, the first witness (PW-1) Maitili, daughter of the deceased Ganesan, gave sworn testimony on June 5, 2025 regarding a civil property matter. The witness's affidavit and seven supporting documents—including a previous court judgment (Case No. 341/2012), death certificate, heirship certificate, and property deeds—were recorded and marked as exhibits. The defendant did not contest the case, and cross-examination was dispensed with; the case proceeded based on the plaintiff's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case