Sub Inspector Of Police Uthukuli Ps vs KARTHICK Advocate - S Dhanapal — 544/2024

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNTI230023862024

e-Filing Number

06-09-2024

Filing Number

2358/2024

Filing Date

06-Sep-2024

Registration No

544/2024

Registration Date

06-Sep-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

405

Police Station

Utukulli Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector Of Police Uthukuli Ps (Police Station)

    Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARTHICK Advocate - S Dhanapal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District Munsif Court in Uthukuli acquitted accused Karthik of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024, holding that the prosecution failed to prove possession for sale beyond reasonable doubt. Although eight bottles of brandy (1.44 litres total) were seized, this quantity fell within the permissible 4.5-litre limit, and the prosecution presented no evidence of sale activity, purchasers, or independent witnesses to establish the intent to sell. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 16-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 20-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 25-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 20-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 02-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 24-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 09-May-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 07-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 18-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 25-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 28-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 22-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 20-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 07-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 09-Oct-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 25-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 06-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 06-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 544/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif Court in Uthukuli acquitted accused Karthik of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024, holding that the prosecution failed to prove possession for sale beyond reasonable doubt. Although eight bottles of brandy (1.44 litres total) were seized, this quantity fell within the permissible 4.5-litre limit, and the prosecution presented no evidence of sale activity, purchasers, or independent witnesses to establish the intent to sell. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case