JAYARAM vs RAJESHWARI Advocate - subramaniam KM — 23/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI230020242023
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
44/2023
Filing Date
29-09-2023
Registration No
23/2023
Registration Date
29-09-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYARAM
Adv. Kumar M
SENTHIL KUMAR
RAJAGANESAN
Respondent(s)
RAJESHWARI Advocate - subramaniam KM
CHANDRAMOHAN
Adv. subramaniam KM
MEGALA
Adv. Subramaniam KM
NITHYA
Adv. subramaniam KM
KANAKARAJ
Adv. Yuvaraj C
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-03-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary In Original Case No. 23/2023 and 12/2023 before the District Civil and Criminal Court, Udhagamandalam, witness testimony was recorded on March 9, 2025 (Case 23/2023) and March 13, 2024 (Case 12/2023) under Rule 44 of 1969 procedure. Three witnesses (PW1, PW2, and PW3) were examined and cross-examined regarding property-related matters; fourteen documentary exhibits including sale deeds, partition documents, and land records spanning from 1952 to 2022 were admitted into evidence. The court adjourned further proceedings pending examination of additional witnesses and documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary In Original Case No. 23/2023 and 12/2023 before the District Civil and Criminal Court, Udhagamandalam, witness testimony was recorded on March 9, 2025 (Case 23/2023) and March 13, 2024 (Case 12/2023) under Rule 44 of 1969 procedure. Three witnesses (PW1, PW2, and PW3) were examined and cross-examined regarding property-related matters; fourteen documentary exhibits including sale deeds, partition documents, and land records spanning from 1952 to 2022 were admitted into evidence. The court adjourned further proceedings pending examination of additional witnesses and documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts