P Sasikumar vs Bharathi Sekar Advocate - Vaikaldurai P — 385/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI230017912024
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
e-Filing Number
30-06-2024
Filing Number
1770/2024
Filing Date
06-07-2024
Registration No
385/2024
Registration Date
06-07-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P Sasikumar
Adv. Ganapathy K
Respondent(s)
Bharathi Sekar Advocate - Vaikaldurai P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a deposition of witness (PW-1) in a commercial dispute case (STC 385/2024) before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthukuli. The witness, Sashikumar (age 48), testified on 27.02.2026 regarding business transactions between his company and the opposing party's company "BM Constructions," involving purchase orders and material deliveries to Green Park, Ganapathipalayam. The witness acknowledged two years of business dealings but stated he lacked supporting documents like delivery notes and invoices mentioning the opposing party's company name, and cross-examination by the opposing counsel was deferred pending bank document verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a deposition of witness (PW-1) in a commercial dispute case (STC 385/2024) before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthukuli. The witness, Sashikumar (age 48), testified on 27.02.2026 regarding business transactions between his company and the opposing party's company "BM Constructions," involving purchase orders and material deliveries to Green Park, Ganapathipalayam. The witness acknowledged two years of business dealings but stated he lacked supporting documents like delivery notes and invoices mentioning the opposing party's company name, and cross-examination by the opposing counsel was deferred pending bank document verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts