MESSRS. CANARA BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, CHENGAPALLI BRACH, CHENGAPALLI vs VINITHKUMAR — 16/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section VII,Rule1. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI230015672023
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
33/2023
Filing Date
04-08-2023
Registration No
16/2023
Registration Date
04-08-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MESSRS. CANARA BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, CHENGAPALLI BRACH, CHENGAPALLI
Adv. KIRUBAKAR
Respondent(s)
VINITHKUMAR
LOGANATHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 06-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 02-04-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 29-03-2026 | Part Heard | |
| 26-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
In Original Case No. 16/2023 before the District Civil and Criminal Court, Udhagamandalam, the court recorded the testimony of PW1 (Selvakadiswaran, a bank manager) on 30.10.2023 regarding an education loan dispute. The court admitted seven documentary exhibits including bank authorization letters, loan applications, education loan certificates, and loan account statements dated between 2015-2023. The case proceeded with one-sided determination against the defendants (who did not contest), and no cross-examination was conducted from the defendant's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Original Case No. 16/2023 before the District Civil and Criminal Court, Udhagamandalam, the court recorded the testimony of PW1 (Selvakadiswaran, a bank manager) on 30.10.2023 regarding an education loan dispute. The court admitted seven documentary exhibits including bank authorization letters, loan applications, education loan certificates, and loan account statements dated between 2015-2023. The case proceeded with one-sided determination against the defendants (who did not contest), and no cross-examination was conducted from the defendant's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts