INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTHUKULI POLICE STATION vs Karthi Advocate - S Dhanapal — 20/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,34. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 30th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI230005102024
e-Filing Number
08-03-2024
Filing Number
501/2024
Filing Date
08-03-2024
Registration No
20/2024
Registration Date
08-03-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
FIR Details
FIR Number
64
Police Station
Utukulli Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTHUKULI POLICE STATION
Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Karthi Advocate - S Dhanapal
A2 Bhuvaneshwaran
Adv. Aristatle sivam S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Questioning
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Court in Uthukuli convicted the first accused (Karthi) of house breaking and theft under IPC Sections 454 and 380, sentencing him to one year simple imprisonment and Rs. 5,000 fine for each offense (running concurrently). The second accused (Bhuvaneshwaran) was acquitted due to insufficient evidence linking him to the crime. The court found the stolen mobile phone's recovery from the first accused, corroborated by electronic evidence (IMEI tracking and SDR records), fingerprint evidence, and the victim's identification conclusively established his guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The District Munsif Court in Uthukuli convicted the first accused (Karthi) of house breaking and theft under IPC Sections 454 and 380, sentencing him to one year simple imprisonment and Rs. 5,000 fine for each offense (running concurrently). The second accused (Bhuvaneshwaran) was acquitted due to insufficient evidence linking him to the crime. The court found the stolen mobile phone's recovery from the first accused, corroborated by electronic evidence (IMEI tracking and SDR records), fingerprint evidence, and the victim's identification conclusively established his guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts