The Sub Inspector Of Police Uthukuli Ps vs Jayachandaran Advocate - Vijay N — 57/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4-A. Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 06th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI230002252026
e-Filing Number
31-01-2026
Filing Number
221/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Judgement on admission
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Sub Inspector Of Police Uthukuli Ps (Police Station)
Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jayachandaran Advocate - Vijay N
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli convicted accused Jayachandaran for an offense under Section 4(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act based on his clear and unqualified admission of guilt. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 1,000 with one week simple imprisonment, and ordered the confiscation of the bottle and destruction of its contents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
Questioning
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 57/2026
The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli convicted accused Jayachandaran for an offense under Section 4(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act based on his clear and unqualified admission of guilt. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 1,000 with one week simple imprisonment, and ordered the confiscation of the bottle and destruction of its contents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts