State Government rep by SI of Police Kaniyur vs Kaleeswaran — 53/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,447,353,506(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI220022412024
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
e-Filing Number
29-08-2024
Filing Number
2169/2024
Filing Date
03-09-2024
Registration No
53/2024
Registration Date
03-09-2024
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government rep by SI of Police Kaniyur
Adv. senthilkumar additional public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Kaleeswaran
SIVARAJ (SIVARASU)
SENTHIL (MARUTHAMUTHU)
MARUTHAMUTHU
MURUGESAN (MURUGAN)
SENTHIL
MURUGAN
MURUGESAN
SAKTHIVEL
SRIDEVI
RAMATHAL
SAKTHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document contains witness depositions (PW 6 and PW 7) recorded in Civil Case 53/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Madathukulam on 10.10.2025. Both witnesses (Vinothkumar and Rameshkumar) testified regarding an incident on 18.12.2020 where a group of people demanded land patta (ownership certificate) at a government temple site, with the executive officer refusing as it was temple property. The witnesses' testimonies were recorded, transcribed, read back to them, and signed by them in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document contains witness depositions (PW 6 and PW 7) recorded in Civil Case 53/2024 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate at Madathukulam on 10.10.2025. Both witnesses (Vinothkumar and Rameshkumar) testified regarding an incident on 18.12.2020 where a group of people demanded land patta (ownership certificate) at a government temple site, with the executive officer refusing as it was temple property. The witnesses' testimonies were recorded, transcribed, read back to them, and signed by them in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts