State Government rep by SI of Police Komaralingam vs Rameshkumar — 373/2023
Case under Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 24(1). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNTI220014092023
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
1366/2023
Filing Date
13-09-2023
Registration No
373/2023
Registration Date
13-09-2023
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government rep by SI of Police Komaralingam
Adv. Senthilkumar Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Rameshkumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Judgement
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: STC 373/2023 | Date: 26.02.2026 Outcome: The court recorded the witness examination testimony in a case involving alleged seizure of contraband tobacco (11 packets) from the accused's shop. The court found significant procedural irregularities: no photographs were taken during seizure, no public witnesses were present during the arrest, and the seized material was destroyed without proper documentation. The court noted discrepancies between the police officer's claims and the actual evidence presented, casting doubt on the investigation's legitimacy and ruling against the prosecution's version of events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: STC 373/2023 | Date: 26.02.2026 Outcome: The court recorded the witness examination testimony in a case involving alleged seizure of contraband tobacco (11 packets) from the accused's shop. The court found significant procedural irregularities: no photographs were taken during seizure, no public witnesses were present during the arrest, and the seized material was destroyed without proper documentation. The court noted discrepancies between the police officer's claims and the actual evidence presented, casting doubt on the investigation's legitimacy and ruling against the prosecution's version of events. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts