SELLADURAI AND 1 OTHER vs SENTHILKUMAR and 8 others — 73/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNTI220008872022
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
09-12-2022
Filing Number
169/2022
Filing Date
08-12-2022
Registration No
73/2022
Registration Date
08-12-2022
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SELLADURAI AND 1 OTHER
Adv. Selvakumar
Selvakumar
Adv. Selvakumar
Respondent(s)
SENTHILKUMAR and 8 others
Katheeskumar
Arumugam
Selvi
Mariyappan
Adv. Senniappan G
Ravi
State Government rep by Sub Registrar Kaniyur
State Government rep by District Collector, Tiruppur
State Government rep by Tahsildhar Madathukulam
State Government rep by Village Administrative Officer Sangaramanallur north village, Madathukulam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 13-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 23-02-2026 | Trial | |
| 02-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC to set aside the ex parte order against the 1st to 4th defendants is allowed. The court found that the defendants had filed a written statement on 30.08.2024 but mistakenly failed to file a memo to adopt it as a counter in I.A.No.255 of 2024, resulting in them being set ex parte. The court, in the interest of justice, set aside the ex parte order to enable proper adjudication of the dispute. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed under Order IX Rule 7 of CPC to set aside the ex parte order against the 1st to 4th defendants is allowed. The court found that the defendants had filed a written statement on 30.08.2024 but mistakenly failed to file a memo to adopt it as a counter in I.A.No.255 of 2024, resulting in them being set ex parte. The court, in the interest of justice, set aside the ex parte order to enable proper adjudication of the dispute. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts