Padmavathi and 10 others vs State Government rep by District Collector, Tiruppur and 1 other — 23/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 R 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI220007202024

Filing Number

29/2024

Filing Date

01-Apr-2024

Registration No

23/2024

Registration Date

01-Apr-2024

Court

District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 R 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Padmavathi and 10 others

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

  2. 2.Valliammal

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

  3. 3.Nandakumar

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

  4. 4.Manimekalai

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

  5. 5.Kannammal

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

  6. 6.Vasanth

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

  7. 7.Jeyarani

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

  8. 8.Saravanan

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

  9. 9.Vennila

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

  10. 10.Masilamani

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

  11. 11.Senthilkumar

    Adv. Sivakumar N K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government rep by District Collector, Tiruppur and 1 other

  2. 2.State Government rep by Tahsildhar, Madathkulam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam dismissed the declaratory suit filed by Padmavathi against the State Government and Tahsildar for default. The court found that despite several opportunities, the plaintiff failed to appear or commence trial, resulting in dismissal of the suit, with both parties bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 13-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 15-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 18-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 14-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 03-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 05-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 02-Apr-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 19-Mar-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 27-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 20-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 08-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 15-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 18-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 27-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 10-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 04-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 01-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 01-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam dismissed the declaratory suit filed by Padmavathi against the State Government and Tahsildar for default. The court found that despite several opportunities, the plaintiff failed to appear or commence trial, resulting in dismissal of the suit, with both parties bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case