Arumugam vs Arulmigu Shri karuppanna samy shri Angala parameswari Thirukovil rep by its Chairman and 4 others — 183/2020

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNTI220005302020

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

183/2020

Filing Date

08-12-2020

Registration No

183/2020

Registration Date

08-12-2020

Court

District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 7
IA/2/2025 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section ArumugamArulmigu Shri karuppanna samy shri Angala parameswari Thirukovil rep by its Chairman and 4 others
IA/3/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section ArumugamSenthil Kumar Panchayat President

Petitioner(s)

Arumugam

Adv. Chidambarasamy C

Respondent(s)

Arulmigu Shri karuppanna samy shri Angala parameswari Thirukovil rep by its Chairman and 4 others

Arulmigu Shri karuppanna samy shri Angala parameswari Thirukovil Treasurer Panneer Selvam

Senthil Kumar Panchayat President

Ranganayagam

Kumaravel

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

23-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Steps

16-02-2026

Steps

28-01-2026

Steps

12-01-2026

Steps

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The District Munsif court dismissed the suit filed by Arumugam seeking permanent injunction against temple and panchayat officials for default. Despite multiple opportunities, the plaintiff failed to take necessary steps for case amendments as represented before the court, making it impossible to proceed. Both parties were ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif court dismissed the suit filed by Arumugam seeking permanent injunction against temple and panchayat officials for default. Despite multiple opportunities, the plaintiff failed to take necessary steps for case amendments as represented before the court, making it impossible to proceed. Both parties were ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case