State Government rep by SI of Police vs Rajendran — 134/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(a). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI220003692019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
134/2019
Filing Date
06-07-2015
Registration No
134/2019
Registration Date
06-07-2015
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
211
Police Station
Madathukulam Police Station
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government rep by SI of Police
Adv. Arunpandian S
Respondent(s)
Rajendran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Copy of Judgment
Interim Orders
The court (Criminal Case 134/2019, dated 27.03.2026) rejected the defendant's contention that the investigation was improper and the final report was wrongly filed. The court found that all documents were properly prepared at the police station, no incident occurred at the alleged place and time, and there was no connection between the defendant and the complainant. The witness examination was conducted in open court, duly recorded, and the witness affirmed the testimony as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court (Criminal Case 134/2019, dated 27.03.2026) rejected the defendant's contention that the investigation was improper and the final report was wrongly filed. The court found that all documents were properly prepared at the police station, no incident occurred at the alleged place and time, and there was no connection between the defendant and the complainant. The witness examination was conducted in open court, duly recorded, and the witness affirmed the testimony as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts