State Government rep by SI of Police Kaniyur vs Kalaiselvan K and one other Advocate - Chidambarasamy C — 24/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),506(ii),326. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI220003222021
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
244/2021
Filing Date
23-06-2021
Registration No
24/2021
Registration Date
23-06-2021
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government rep by SI of Police Kaniyur
Adv. Arunpandian S
Respondent(s)
Kalaiselvan K and one other Advocate - Chidambarasamy C
Sureshkumar N
Adv. Chidambarasamy C
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a deposition of witness (P.W. 5 - Chellamuthu) recorded on 27.02.2026 in Criminal Case No. 24/2021 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Madathukulam. The witness, a retired Special Sub-Inspector, testified regarding FIR No. 694/2020 filed under IPC sections 341, 294(b), 324, and 506(2). The court found discrepancies in the witness's testimony regarding dates, times, and distance details as highlighted in the cross-examination by the defense, and the deposition was recorded and signed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a deposition of witness (P.W. 5 - Chellamuthu) recorded on 27.02.2026 in Criminal Case No. 24/2021 before the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Madathukulam. The witness, a retired Special Sub-Inspector, testified regarding FIR No. 694/2020 filed under IPC sections 341, 294(b), 324, and 506(2). The court found discrepancies in the witness's testimony regarding dates, times, and distance details as highlighted in the cross-examination by the defense, and the deposition was recorded and signed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts