State Government rep by SI of Police Madathukulam vs Karuppusamy and 1 other — 34/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 342, 324, 506(ii), 34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNTI220003022023

Filing Number

280/2023

Filing Date

26-Apr-2023

Registration No

34/2023

Registration Date

26-Apr-2023

Court

District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 342, 324, 506(ii), 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government rep by SI of Police Madathukulam

    Adv. Senthilkumar Additional Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karuppusamy and 1 other

  2. 2.Karthi

Case History

  1. 02-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY Court: District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Madathukulam Case No.: CC 34/2023 Date: 18.12.2025 Outcome: Three witnesses (Subramaniam, Kanniammal, and Ranganathan) deposed before the court on allegations of assault occurring on 01.01.2023. The witnesses testified that two accused persons assaulted the complainant with a whip, causing injuries requiring 4 days of hospitalization. All three witness statements were recorded, transcribed, and formally admitted into evidence with no cross-examination or re-examination from the accused's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 29-Jul-2024

    Questioning

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 15-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 15-May-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 02-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 29-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 15-Dec-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 25-Oct-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 05-Aug-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 06-Jun-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 26-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 26-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2023

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY Court: District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Madathukulam Case No.: CC 34/2023 Date: 18.12.2025 Outcome: Three witnesses (Subramaniam, Kanniammal, and Ranganathan) deposed before the court on allegations of assault occurring on 01.01.2023. The witnesses testified that two accused persons assaulted the complainant with a whip, causing injuries requiring 4 days of hospitalization. All three witness statements were recorded, transcribed, and formally admitted into evidence with no cross-examination or re-examination from the accused's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case