State Government rep by SI of Police Madathukulam vs Chellammal — 17/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341, 353. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNTI220001842023
Filing Number
172/2023
Filing Date
09-Mar-2023
Registration No
17/2023
Registration Date
09-Mar-2023
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Madathukulam
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government rep by SI of Police Madathukulam
Adv. SenthilKumar Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chellammal
Case History
-
02-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: CC 17/2023 | Date: 12.02.2026 | Court: District Civil and Revenue Arbitration Court, Madurai Summary: This is a civil case concerning land encroachment in Mayavadi village. The court examined three witnesses (a former revenue official, a former tahsildar, and a former village administrator) regarding alleged encroachment on government land by the defendant (Sellammal). The witnesses testified about measurement surveys conducted, removal of coconut trees from the encroached area using JCB machinery, and the procedural steps followed. The case involves disputes over land boundaries, notice procedures, and whether proper legal protocols were observed during the encroachment removal operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2024
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Feb-2024
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2023
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2023
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Sep-2023
Questioning
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Aug-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
31-May-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Apr-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2023
Court Order Summary Case: CC 17/2023 | Date: 12.02.2026 | Court: District Civil and Revenue Arbitration Court, Madurai Summary: This is a civil case concerning land encroachment in Mayavadi village. The court examined three witnesses (a former revenue official, a former tahsildar, and a former village administrator) regarding alleged encroachment on government land by the defendant (Sellammal). The witnesses testified about measurement surveys conducted, removal of coconut trees from the encroached area using JCB machinery, and the procedural steps followed. The case involves disputes over land boundaries, notice procedures, and whether proper legal protocols were observed during the encroachment removal operation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts