GEETHA vs Kishore — 452/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1)(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTI210007072024
e-Filing Number
03-08-2024
Filing Number
725/2024
Filing Date
06-Aug-2024
Registration No
452/2024
Registration Date
02-Sep-2024
Court
Sub Court, Palladam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GEETHA
Adv. eswaramoorthy moorthy
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kishore
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This document records the cross-examination of witness Geetha (PW1) in a motor accident case (MCOP No. 452/2024) dated 16.04.2026. The witness testified that her daughter suffered from viral fever requiring ambulance transport, and she sustained a bone fracture in the accident, contradicting claims that no injuries occurred and that the ambulance driver lacked proper licensing. The court recorded the witness's sworn statement after she affirmed its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 452/2024
This document records the cross-examination of witness Geetha (PW1) in a motor accident case (MCOP No. 452/2024) dated 16.04.2026. The witness testified that her daughter suffered from viral fever requiring ambulance transport, and she sustained a bone fracture in the accident, contradicting claims that no injuries occurred and that the ambulance driver lacked proper licensing. The court recorded the witness's sworn statement after she affirmed its accuracy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts