M. Krishnasami vs S. Rajmohan — 162/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTI210006972022

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

Filing Number

677/2022

Filing Date

16-12-2022

Registration No

162/2022

Registration Date

20-12-2022

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1)

Petitioner(s)

M. Krishnasami

Adv. Mohan V

Respondent(s)

S. Rajmohan

T. Prabakaran

The Branch Manage, Iffco Tokio General Insurance company Limited.,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

05-03-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

12-12-2025

Enquiry

27-11-2025

Enquiry

Interim Orders

12-02-2026
Copy of Deposition

This is a Tamil language court order (MCOP No. 162/2022, dated 12.02.2026) documenting the cross-examination of witness PW1 (Krishnasamy) by the third respondent's counsel in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness testified regarding a two-wheeler accident that occurred at a four-road junction near Lakshmi Mill, admitting he had no valid driving license and was unfamiliar with traffic rules. The court record documents the witness's testimony being transcribed directly into the computer, read back to him, confirmed as accurate, and signed by the witness, as certified by the presiding judge K. Yuvaraj. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil language court order (MCOP No. 162/2022, dated 12.02.2026) documenting the cross-examination of witness PW1 (Krishnasamy) by the third respondent's counsel in a motor vehicle accident case. The witness testified regarding a two-wheeler accident that occurred at a four-road junction near Lakshmi Mill, admitting he had no valid driving license and was unfamiliar with traffic rules. The court record documents the witness's testimony being transcribed directly into the computer, read back to him, confirmed as accurate, and signed by the witness, as certified by the presiding judge K. Yuvaraj. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case