Raja vs Pradeesh — 97/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTI210006262022

Filing Number

606/2022

Filing Date

01-Dec-2022

Registration No

97/2022

Registration Date

05-Dec-2022

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raja

    Adv. Balakumar A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pradeesh

  2. 2.Saravanan Jayaprakasham

  3. 3.The Manager, Iffco Tokio General insurance company limited.,

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 25-Aug-2025

    Await Reports

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 21-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This is a Motor Claim Objection Petition (MCOP.No. 97/2022) dated 21.07.2025 in which witness Raja (PW1) testified and was cross-examined by the third respondent's counsel. The witness testified on oath that he was a wage laborer, denied being fully injured in the accident, and stated that the third respondent lacked a valid driving license and was legally a minor, thus only the first and second respondents are liable for the accident. The witness's statement was recorded directly on computer, read back to him, confirmed as accurate, and signed by him before the presiding judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 05-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 20-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 16-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 14-Nov-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 03-Oct-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 16-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 24-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 06-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 11-Mar-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 01-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 18-Dec-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 10-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 07-Oct-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 30-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 27-Jul-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 20-Apr-2023

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 30-Mar-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 02-Mar-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 27-Jan-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 05-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 01-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 97/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a Motor Claim Objection Petition (MCOP.No. 97/2022) dated 21.07.2025 in which witness Raja (PW1) testified and was cross-examined by the third respondent's counsel. The witness testified on oath that he was a wage laborer, denied being fully injured in the accident, and stated that the third respondent lacked a valid driving license and was legally a minor, thus only the first and second respondents are liable for the accident. The witness's statement was recorded directly on computer, read back to him, confirmed as accurate, and signed by him before the presiding judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case