Raja vs Pradeesh — 97/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTI210006262022
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
606/2022
Filing Date
01-12-2022
Registration No
97/2022
Registration Date
05-12-2022
Court
Sub Court, Palladam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raja
Adv. Balakumar A
Respondent(s)
Pradeesh
Saravanan Jayaprakasham
The Manager, Iffco Tokio General insurance company limited.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 03-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 20-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a Motor Claim Objection Petition (MCOP.No. 97/2022) dated 21.07.2025 in which witness Raja (PW1) testified and was cross-examined by the third respondent's counsel. The witness testified on oath that he was a wage laborer, denied being fully injured in the accident, and stated that the third respondent lacked a valid driving license and was legally a minor, thus only the first and second respondents are liable for the accident. The witness's statement was recorded directly on computer, read back to him, confirmed as accurate, and signed by him before the presiding judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a Motor Claim Objection Petition (MCOP.No. 97/2022) dated 21.07.2025 in which witness Raja (PW1) testified and was cross-examined by the third respondent's counsel. The witness testified on oath that he was a wage laborer, denied being fully injured in the accident, and stated that the third respondent lacked a valid driving license and was legally a minor, thus only the first and second respondents are liable for the accident. The witness's statement was recorded directly on computer, read back to him, confirmed as accurate, and signed by him before the presiding judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts