U Vengatachalam vs L Arun Kumar — 324/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166(1). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTI210006152024
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
04-07-2024
Filing Number
637/2024
Filing Date
08-07-2024
Registration No
324/2024
Registration Date
16-07-2024
Court
Sub Court, Palladam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
U Vengatachalam
Adv. Mohan V
V Palaniyammal
Adv. Mohan V
P Manoranjitham
Adv. Mohan V
P Nanthini Priya
Adv. Mohan V
P Durga Devi
Adv. Mohan V
P Geethanjali
Adv. Mohan V
Respondent(s)
L Arun Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Amendment
Steps
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 09-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In MCOP No. 324/2024 before the Subordinate Court, Palladam (Tiruppur District), the witness (PW1) Manaranajitham was examined on oath on October 13, 2025. The plaintiff's side witness testified and submitted written examination-in-chief statements along with documentary evidence including FIR copy, final report, vehicle inspection reports, insurance documents, death certificate, and heir certificate of the deceased husband. The witness's statement was recorded verbatim by the typist, read over to the witness, confirmed as correct, and signed by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In MCOP No. 324/2024 before the Subordinate Court, Palladam (Tiruppur District), the witness (PW1) Manaranajitham was examined on oath on October 13, 2025. The plaintiff's side witness testified and submitted written examination-in-chief statements along with documentary evidence including FIR copy, final report, vehicle inspection reports, insurance documents, death certificate, and heir certificate of the deceased husband. The witness's statement was recorded verbatim by the typist, read over to the witness, confirmed as correct, and signed by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts