L.Marimuthu vs J.Krishanu Kumar — 63/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Orders Next hearing 22-Apr-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTI210005802022

Filing Number

560/2022

Filing Date

26-Sep-2022

Registration No

63/2022

Registration Date

18-Nov-2022

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L.Marimuthu

    Adv. Mohan V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.J.Krishanu Kumar

  2. 2.B.Jeevan Kumar

  3. 3.The Branch Manager, Reliance Insurance company Limited.,

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a court order from the Subordinate Court in Palladam (MCOP.NO 63/2022) documenting witness examination in a motor vehicle accident compensation case. The witness (PW1 - Marimuthu) testified on February 9, 2026, and submitted evidence including FIR, final investigation report, vehicle examiner report, injury certificate, medical records from Muthus Hospital (spanning February-November 2022), medical bills totaling ₹18,56,724, and photographs. The court recorded cross-examination wherein the defendant challenged the witness's credibility regarding vehicle identification discrepancies (Bolero vs. Boleno), causation of injury, medical treatment adequacy, and income loss claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 05-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 16-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 21-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 16-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 17-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 25-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 05-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 16-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 20-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 13-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 06-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 26-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 06-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 17-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 18-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 13-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 11-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 19-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 28-Mar-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 15-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 03-Jan-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 14-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 21-Sep-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 16-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 05-Jul-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 08-Jun-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 13-Apr-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 06-Mar-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 04-Jan-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  44. 18-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 26-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2022

casestatus.in Summary

This is a court order from the Subordinate Court in Palladam (MCOP.NO 63/2022) documenting witness examination in a motor vehicle accident compensation case. The witness (PW1 - Marimuthu) testified on February 9, 2026, and submitted evidence including FIR, final investigation report, vehicle examiner report, injury certificate, medical records from Muthus Hospital (spanning February-November 2022), medical bills totaling ₹18,56,724, and photographs. The court recorded cross-examination wherein the defendant challenged the witness's credibility regarding vehicle identification discrepancies (Bolero vs. Boleno), causation of injury, medical treatment adequacy, and income loss claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case