L.Marimuthu vs J.Krishanu Kumar — 63/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 166(1). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNTI210005802022
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
560/2022
Filing Date
26-09-2022
Registration No
63/2022
Registration Date
18-11-2022
Court
Sub Court, Palladam
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
L.Marimuthu
Adv. Mohan V
Respondent(s)
J.Krishanu Kumar
B.Jeevan Kumar
The Branch Manager, Reliance Insurance company Limited.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge
Orders
Orders
Orders
Reopen
Orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Orders | |
| 27-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 23-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 13-03-2026 | Reopen | |
| 09-03-2026 | Orders |
Interim Orders
This is a court order from the Subordinate Court in Palladam (MCOP.NO 63/2022) documenting witness examination in a motor vehicle accident compensation case. The witness (PW1 - Marimuthu) testified on February 9, 2026, and submitted evidence including FIR, final investigation report, vehicle examiner report, injury certificate, medical records from Muthus Hospital (spanning February-November 2022), medical bills totaling ₹18,56,724, and photographs. The court recorded cross-examination wherein the defendant challenged the witness's credibility regarding vehicle identification discrepancies (Bolero vs. Boleno), causation of injury, medical treatment adequacy, and income loss claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a court order from the Subordinate Court in Palladam (MCOP.NO 63/2022) documenting witness examination in a motor vehicle accident compensation case. The witness (PW1 - Marimuthu) testified on February 9, 2026, and submitted evidence including FIR, final investigation report, vehicle examiner report, injury certificate, medical records from Muthus Hospital (spanning February-November 2022), medical bills totaling ₹18,56,724, and photographs. The court recorded cross-examination wherein the defendant challenged the witness's credibility regarding vehicle identification discrepancies (Bolero vs. Boleno), causation of injury, medical treatment adequacy, and income loss claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts