L.Marimuthu vs J.Krishna kumar — 62/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTI210005792022

Filing Number

559/2022

Filing Date

26-Sep-2022

Registration No

62/2022

Registration Date

18-Nov-2022

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L.Marimuthu

    Adv. Mohan V

  2. 2.Minor.M.Dhivakaran Rep by his Natural Guardian Father L.Marimuthu

  3. 3.Minor.M.Mithun Rep by his Natural Guardian Father L.Marimuthu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.J.Krishna kumar

  2. 2.B.Jeevan Kumar

  3. 3.The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance company Limited.,

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This is a motor vehicle accident case (MCOP.No. 62/2022) where witness PW1 (Marimuthu) testified on 21.11.2025 regarding a fatal accident on 07.02.2022 on a national highway that resulted in the death of the witness's wife. The witness denied allegations that he lacked a valid driving license, drove recklessly at high speed, or that vehicle defects caused the accident, and also denied that he and his wife wore seatbelts. The court recorded the witness's cross-examination statement and the matter remains in examination stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 05-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 20-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 13-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 06-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 26-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 17-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 18-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 08-Aug-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 27-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 30-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 13-Mar-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 07-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 02-Jan-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 14-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 21-Sep-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 17-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 05-Jul-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 08-Jun-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 13-Apr-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 06-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 04-Jan-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  39. 18-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 26-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a motor vehicle accident case (MCOP.No. 62/2022) where witness PW1 (Marimuthu) testified on 21.11.2025 regarding a fatal accident on 07.02.2022 on a national highway that resulted in the death of the witness's wife. The witness denied allegations that he lacked a valid driving license, drove recklessly at high speed, or that vehicle defects caused the accident, and also denied that he and his wife wore seatbelts. The court recorded the witness's cross-examination statement and the matter remains in examination stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case