L.Marimuthu vs J.Krishna kumar — 62/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTI210005792022

Evidence

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

559/2022

Filing Date

26-09-2022

Registration No

62/2022

Registration Date

18-11-2022

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 166(1)

Petitioner(s)

L.Marimuthu

Adv. Mohan V

Minor.M.Dhivakaran Rep by his Natural Guardian Father L.Marimuthu

Minor.M.Mithun Rep by his Natural Guardian Father L.Marimuthu

Respondent(s)

J.Krishna kumar

B.Jeevan Kumar

The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance company Limited.,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

05-03-2026

Evidence

19-02-2026

Evidence

09-02-2026

Evidence

05-02-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

21-11-2025
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This is a motor vehicle accident case (MCOP.No. 62/2022) where witness PW1 (Marimuthu) testified on 21.11.2025 regarding a fatal accident on 07.02.2022 on a national highway that resulted in the death of the witness's wife. The witness denied allegations that he lacked a valid driving license, drove recklessly at high speed, or that vehicle defects caused the accident, and also denied that he and his wife wore seatbelts. The court recorded the witness's cross-examination statement and the matter remains in examination stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a motor vehicle accident case (MCOP.No. 62/2022) where witness PW1 (Marimuthu) testified on 21.11.2025 regarding a fatal accident on 07.02.2022 on a national highway that resulted in the death of the witness's wife. The witness denied allegations that he lacked a valid driving license, drove recklessly at high speed, or that vehicle defects caused the accident, and also denied that he and his wife wore seatbelts. The court recorded the witness's cross-examination statement and the matter remains in examination stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case