K.Nandha Gopal vs Veerakumar — 83/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 166(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNTI210005112022

Evidence

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

491/2022

Filing Date

17-10-2022

Registration No

83/2022

Registration Date

01-12-2022

Court

Sub Court, Palladam

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 166(1)

Petitioner(s)

K.Nandha Gopal

Adv. Eswaramoorthy P

Respondent(s)

Veerakumar

Vishnu prakash

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

07-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

23-01-2026

Evidence

06-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

14-08-2025
Copy of Deposition

Case Summary MCOP No. 83/2022 | Date: 14.08.2025 This is a motor vehicle accident insurance claim case in Tamil involving a motor cycle accident. The witness (PW1) testified that he was solely responsible for causing the accident due to his negligence and excessive speed, that his two-wheeler's tire burst, and that he had no valid driving license at the time (expired since 17.08.2017). The court found the claimant's case lacking in documentary evidence for agricultural income claims and medical expenses (copies only, not originals), and dismissed the petition against the first defendant, directing that if compensation is needed, the second defendant should bear liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary MCOP No. 83/2022 | Date: 14.08.2025 This is a motor vehicle accident insurance claim case in Tamil involving a motor cycle accident. The witness (PW1) testified that he was solely responsible for causing the accident due to his negligence and excessive speed, that his two-wheeler's tire burst, and that he had no valid driving license at the time (expired since 17.08.2017). The court found the claimant's case lacking in documentary evidence for agricultural income claims and medical expenses (copies only, not originals), and dismissed the petition against the first defendant, directing that if compensation is needed, the second defendant should bear liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Palladam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case